Engineering · Interactive demo

Why launch rockets from a 20 km tower?

Raise a rocket’s launch pad from sea level to 20 km and watch the air fall away, the engine bell grow and the payload double, from a NASA Glenn study.

Created by ExplainerTools.

About this explainer

Made by
ExplainerTools
Format
Interactive demo
Subject
Engineering
Where it runs
Plays here
Full tool
Open the tool page
Published
Added to collection
  • rockets
  • launch towers
  • atmosphere
  • rocket engines
  • Neal Stephenson

How the model works

1 See

Half of all the air sits within 5.5 km of the ground, and a rocket has to shove through all of it. Neal Stephenson thinks somebody ought to build a tower 20 km tall and launch from the top. Why would that help so much?

2 Change
  • Tower heightsea level → 25 km
  • Payload share of the rocketsingle-stage ~2% → 8%

Presets Sea level · 0 kmBurj Khalifa · 0.8 kmEverest · 8.8 kmAirliner cruise · 11 kmStephenson’s tower · 20 km

Model · Landis 2003 single-stage-rocket study, interpolated

US Standard Atmosphere 1976 for the air; rocket gains interpolated from Landis, Denis & Lyons (NASA Glenn, 2003), a single-stage-to-orbit design with payload 2% of liftoff mass. The tower’s structure, winds and cost are not modeled.

Model notes and sources

Model. Air pressure follows the US Standard Atmosphere 1976, with h in metres: p = 101,325 × (1 − 2.25577×10−5 h)5.25588 Pa below 11 km; p = 22,632 × e−1.57688×10−4 (h − 11,000) from 11 to 20 km; p = 5,474.89 × (1 + (h − 20,000) / 216,650)−34.1632 from 20 to 32 km. Pressure is the weight of the air overhead, so the share of the atmosphere above a height is p/p0: 31% at Everest’s 8,849 m, 22% at 11 km, 11.9% at 15 km, 5.4% at 20 km (94.6% below) and 2.5% at 25 km. The rocket’s gains are from Geoffrey Landis, Vincent Denis and Valerie Lyons’s NASA Glenn study of a single-stage-to-orbit rocket launched from altitude (Table 3). Compared with a sea-level launch, at 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 km the velocity lost to drag falls by 0.30, 0.94, 1.24, 1.39 and 1.46%; the average specific impulse (Isp, the engine’s efficiency) rises by 4.70, 8.70, 12.25, 15.40 and 18.22%, largely because the engine can use a bigger, vacuum-style bell from liftoff; and the final mass delivered to orbit rises by 5.00, 9.64, 13.49, 16.79 and 19.68%. The drag saving is the smallest of the three; most of the gain comes from the engine’s efficiency. Between those rows the tool interpolates with a monotone cubic (PCHIP), which passes through every row. The engine bells are drawn to show the trend; their sizes are not from the study.

Why the payload doubles. Landis’s rocket is 87.5% propellant, so 12.5% of its liftoff mass reaches orbit as structure plus payload. Launched higher, that final mass grows by F(h), the Table 3 gain. The structure does not change, so the payload gets all of it: payload = p + 12.5% × F(h), and the multiplier is 1 + 12.5 × F(h) / p. At p = 2% this reproduces Landis’s payload column: at 20 km, 2% + 2.1% = 4.1% of liftoff mass, ×2.05 (his table: +104.9%). The crates show 10 × the multiplier. Other payload shares on the Payload share control are our extrapolation of his single-stage result; a two-stage rocket gains less.

The catch. Height is not speed. 20 km of height is worth g·h = 9.81 × 20,000 ≈ 196 kJ per kg; orbital speed, about 7.8 km/s sideways, is worth ½v² ≈ 30.4 MJ per kg. So the tower supplies about 0.6% of the energy (the same as about 626 m/s of speed, √(2gh)). This comparison leaves out the losses to gravity and drag on the climb. The film’s Earth view is to scale: radius 6,371 km, the tower 20 km and an orbit 200 km up, where the circular speed √(μ/r) is about 7.8 km/s (μ = 398,600 km³/s²). The tower itself is the hard part. Landis’s Table 1 (from his 1998 study) puts a 15 km tower supporting a 2,000-tonne launch at about 5,300 t in cast steel, with an area taper of 2.6:1, or about 280 t in graphite-epoxy. Wind is the real enemy: the jet stream blows about 9–16 km up, and Stephenson, who studied the idea with Arizona State engineer Keith Hjelmstad, said in 2013: “In a windless environment making a structure that tall would almost be trivial.” Thoth Technology patented a 20 km inflatable tower in 2015. Not modeled: the tower’s structure and cost, winds, how the rocket would be lifted and fuelled up there, and any rocket other than Landis’s single-stage design. Rockets already launch from high up: Virgin Orbit’s LauncherOne was dropped from a 747 at about 10.7 km, and Pegasus from an L-1011 at about 12 km.

The pictures. Everything on the stage is drawn in code from the model. The side view is to scale in height (0–30 km); the rocket, the aircraft and the tower’s width are not. The air dots are spread so that their density follows the air’s, so the share of dots above a height is the share of the atmosphere above it. In the Short, any real footage (Neal Stephenson on Core Memory; a rocket engine) is a short excerpt, picture only, credited on screen; the numbers come from the model, not from the clips.

Neal Stephenson. In his conversation with Ashlee Vance (Core Memory, episode 94, 28 October 2026, from 1:13:43) he names the idea he would still back: “the one that I still think somebody ought to build is the tall tower”. Among its advantages: “it’s not as noisy up there”, so the rocket need not be built to survive its own noise.

Sources: G. A. Landis, V. Denis and V. Lyons, High Altitude Launch for a Practical SSTO (STAIF 2003, NASA Glenn Research Center); Core Memory episode 94, video (chapter “Rockets, Guns and Giant Towers”, 1:13:43) and episode page; Wikipedia, U.S. Standard Atmosphere, Jet stream, Burj Khalifa (828 m), Mount Everest (8,849 m), Concorde (cruise about 18 km), LauncherOne and Pegasus; Motherboard, The twelve-mile-high skyscraper is on pause thanks to the jet stream (19 September 2013); Arizona State University, Project Hieroglyph: Tower Project Overview; Silicon Republic, 20 km space elevator idea awarded a patent (Thoth Technology, 2015).

An ExplainerTools Original. Concept from Neal Stephenson’s conversation with Ashlee Vance on Core Memory (episode 94, October 2026).

Watch it move

See how the world works.

Explore interactive ideas in space, science, math, and more. Try a demo, read an interactive article, watch a short video, and follow what makes you curious.

Find your next rabbit hole

New Originals

Change one thing and see why.

The three newest models, each with a short film. Watch the question, then play with the answer.

All Originals

Follow your curiosity

A collection of small doors into big ideas.

Format

Subject

Topic

Sort by

Rankings count activity here on ExplainerTools. Newest means added to this collection.

Loading collection…

Opening the collection…

Make something click.

Made an explainer, or found one you love? Give it a place in the collection.

Your next question

What do you wish someone would explain?

Send one question. If it becomes an ExplainerTools Original, you can hear when it is ready.

One weekly email with new explainers. We send a confirmation link first, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

We save your question, your email if you add one, and whether you asked to subscribe. Privacy

Share something worth understanding.

An interactive demo, an interactive article, or an educational video. Every suggestion is reviewed before it joins the collection.

Submit the creator’s original link. We credit creators and link to their work.

A collection for the curious.

ExplainerTools collects interactive explainers, visual essays, and educational videos that help an idea make sense. Browse by subject, follow a topic, or find a creator whose way of explaining speaks to you.

The work belongs to its creators.

Every entry credits its original creator. Supported experiences play here, with a link to the creator’s original work available in the player. Inclusion does not imply a partnership or endorsement.

How rankings work

Views, likes, and bookmarks count activity on ExplainerTools. They don’t include views or likes from a creator’s website or social accounts. Newest means most recently added to this collection. Ties are ordered by date added, then our curated catalog order.

Your collection

New likes and bookmarks require a free account and sync across devices when sign-in is available. Previously saved items from this browser may remain visible here.

Browse the catalog data or read about privacy.