Skip to the interactive
ExplainerTools Watch the 39-second film

Space · interactive

Why launch rockets from a 20 km tower?

Model · Landis 2003 single-stage-rocket study, interpolated

Left: the sky to scale, 0–30 km; each dot is a share of the air. Right: the air above the rocket, the engine bell the height allows, the payload in crates, and where the liftoff mass goes. Drag the tower top, or use the controls.

1 See

Half of all the air sits within 5.5 km of the ground, and a rocket has to shove through all of it. Neal Stephenson thinks somebody ought to build a tower 20 km tall and launch from the top. Why would that help so much?

2 Change

3 Understand

The 39-second film · Watch with transcript
Watch the 39-second film
Model notes and sources

Model. Air pressure follows the US Standard Atmosphere 1976, with h in metres: p = 101,325 × (1 − 2.25577×10−5 h)5.25588 Pa below 11 km; p = 22,632 × e−1.57688×10−4 (h − 11,000) from 11 to 20 km; p = 5,474.89 × (1 + (h − 20,000) / 216,650)−34.1632 from 20 to 32 km. Pressure is the weight of the air overhead, so the share of the atmosphere above a height is p/p0: 31% at Everest’s 8,849 m, 22% at 11 km, 11.9% at 15 km, 5.4% at 20 km (94.6% below) and 2.5% at 25 km. The rocket’s gains are from Geoffrey Landis, Vincent Denis and Valerie Lyons’s NASA Glenn study of a single-stage-to-orbit rocket launched from altitude (Table 3). Compared with a sea-level launch, at 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 km the velocity lost to drag falls by 0.30, 0.94, 1.24, 1.39 and 1.46%; the average specific impulse (Isp, the engine’s efficiency) rises by 4.70, 8.70, 12.25, 15.40 and 18.22%, largely because the engine can use a bigger, vacuum-style bell from liftoff; and the final mass delivered to orbit rises by 5.00, 9.64, 13.49, 16.79 and 19.68%. The drag saving is the smallest of the three; most of the gain comes from the engine’s efficiency. Between those rows the tool interpolates with a monotone cubic (PCHIP), which passes through every row. The engine bells are drawn to show the trend; their sizes are not from the study.

Why the payload doubles. Landis’s rocket is 87.5% propellant, so 12.5% of its liftoff mass reaches orbit as structure plus payload. Launched higher, that final mass grows by F(h), the Table 3 gain. The structure does not change, so the payload gets all of it: payload = p + 12.5% × F(h), and the multiplier is 1 + 12.5 × F(h) / p. At p = 2% this reproduces Landis’s payload column: at 20 km, 2% + 2.1% = 4.1% of liftoff mass, ×2.05 (his table: +104.9%). The crates show 10 × the multiplier. Other payload shares on the Payload share control are our extrapolation of his single-stage result; a two-stage rocket gains less.

The catch. Height is not speed. 20 km of height is worth g·h = 9.81 × 20,000 ≈ 196 kJ per kg; orbital speed, about 7.8 km/s sideways, is worth ½v² ≈ 30.4 MJ per kg. So the tower supplies about 0.6% of the energy (the same as about 626 m/s of speed, √(2gh)). This comparison leaves out the losses to gravity and drag on the climb. The film’s Earth view is to scale: radius 6,371 km, the tower 20 km and an orbit 200 km up, where the circular speed √(μ/r) is about 7.8 km/s (μ = 398,600 km³/s²). The tower itself is the hard part. Landis’s Table 1 (from his 1998 study) puts a 15 km tower supporting a 2,000-tonne launch at about 5,300 t in cast steel, with an area taper of 2.6:1, or about 280 t in graphite-epoxy. Wind is the real enemy: the jet stream blows about 9–16 km up, and Stephenson, who studied the idea with Arizona State engineer Keith Hjelmstad, said in 2013: “In a windless environment making a structure that tall would almost be trivial.” Thoth Technology patented a 20 km inflatable tower in 2015. Not modeled: the tower’s structure and cost, winds, how the rocket would be lifted and fuelled up there, and any rocket other than Landis’s single-stage design. Rockets already launch from high up: Virgin Orbit’s LauncherOne was dropped from a 747 at about 10.7 km, and Pegasus from an L-1011 at about 12 km.

The pictures. Everything on the stage is drawn in code from the model. The side view is to scale in height (0–30 km); the rocket, the aircraft and the tower’s width are not. The air dots are spread so that their density follows the air’s, so the share of dots above a height is the share of the atmosphere above it. In the Short, any real footage (Neal Stephenson on Core Memory; a rocket engine) is a short excerpt, picture only, credited on screen; the numbers come from the model, not from the clips.

Neal Stephenson. In his conversation with Ashlee Vance (Core Memory, episode 94, 28 October 2026, from 1:13:43) he names the idea he would still back: “the one that I still think somebody ought to build is the tall tower”. Among its advantages: “it’s not as noisy up there”, so the rocket need not be built to survive its own noise.

Sources: G. A. Landis, V. Denis and V. Lyons, High Altitude Launch for a Practical SSTO (STAIF 2003, NASA Glenn Research Center); Core Memory episode 94, video (chapter “Rockets, Guns and Giant Towers”, 1:13:43) and episode page; Wikipedia, U.S. Standard Atmosphere, Jet stream, Burj Khalifa (828 m), Mount Everest (8,849 m), Concorde (cruise about 18 km), LauncherOne and Pegasus; Motherboard, The twelve-mile-high skyscraper is on pause thanks to the jet stream (19 September 2013); Arizona State University, Project Hieroglyph: Tower Project Overview; Silicon Republic, 20 km space elevator idea awarded a patent (Thoth Technology, 2015).

An ExplainerTools Original. Concept from Neal Stephenson’s conversation with Ashlee Vance on Core Memory (episode 94, October 2026).

Behind the film

Concepts in this film

The ideas the film moves through, with this model’s numbers, the research behind each one and where else it comes up.

All concepts, A to Z

Air pressure

Air pressure is the weight of all the air above you, so the pressure at a height tells you how much of the atmosphere is still overhead. About 31% is left at the top of Everest, 22% at 11 km where airliners cruise, and 5.4% at 20 km; half of all the air sits within 5.5 km of the ground. A rocket on top of a 20 km tower starts above 94.6% of the atmosphere, and the air dots on the stage follow the same US Standard Atmosphere numbers.

Related research U.S. Standard Atmosphere (Wikipedia)Atmospheric pressure (Wikipedia)

See also Journal: Most of the air is near the groundWays to space: What does a 20 km tower buy?

Nozzle expansion ratio

A rocket nozzle is a bell that lets hot exhaust expand and speed up: the wider its exit compared with its narrow throat (the expansion ratio), the faster and thinner the exhaust leaves. A nozzle works best when its exhaust leaves at the pressure outside. At sea level that is 101 kPa, and a long bell would expand the gas far below it; once the exhaust drops under roughly 30–45% of the outside pressure, the flow peels away from the wall, which can throw the thrust sideways and damage the nozzle. So engines that start at sea level wear short bells. At 20 km the outside pressure is about 5.5 kPa, 5.4% of sea level, so the engine can wear a long, vacuum-style bell from liftoff.

Related research Rocket engine nozzle (Wikipedia)NASA Glenn, Rocket Nozzle Interactive Simulator

See also Rocket Nozzle Lab by Ryan Sael: change a nozzle’s surroundingsJournal: Where the gain really comes fromWays to space: the tower

Specific impulse

Specific impulse (Isp) measures how much push an engine gets from its propellant. It is written in seconds; multiply it by g0 = 9.81 m/s² and you get the effective exhaust speed. In Landis’s NASA Glenn study, launching from 20 km raises the rocket’s average Isp by 15.4% (4.7% at 5 km, 18.2% at 25 km), mostly because of the bigger bell. That, not the 1.4% cut in speed lost to drag, is where most of the tower’s gain comes from.

Related research NASA Glenn, Specific ImpulseLandis, Denis & Lyons, High Altitude Launch for a Practical SSTO (NASA Glenn, 2003)

See also Journal: Where the gain really comes fromWays to space: the tower

Rocket equation

Tsiolkovsky’s rocket equation, Δv = ve ln(m0/mf), says a rocket’s speed grows only with the logarithm of how much heavier it is full than empty. So most of a rocket is propellant: 87.5% of Landis’s single-stage design, which leaves 12.5% of the liftoff mass to reach orbit as structure and payload, and only 2% as payload. From 20 km, the mass that reaches orbit grows by about 17%. The structure does not change, so the payload takes all of it: 2% + 2.1% = 4.1% of liftoff mass, about twice as much.

Related research NASA Glenn, Ideal Rocket EquationTsiolkovsky rocket equation (Wikipedia)

See also Whip Crack Lab: a head start saves fuelJournal: Why 17% becomes doubleWays to space: Why is getting to orbit so hard?

Max Q

Max Q is the moment in a climb when the air pushes hardest on a rocket. The push is the dynamic pressure, q = ½ρv²: zero on the pad, rising as the rocket speeds up, then falling as the air thins. The Space Shuttle met it about a minute after launch, near 11 km, at about 0.32 atmospheres, and throttled its engines down to get through; the airframe has to be built for that peak. At 20 km the air is about 7% as dense as at sea level, so at the same speed it pushes about 14 times less. Stephenson lists that lower peak load among the tower’s advantages, because less weight goes into structure; the tool holds the structure fixed, so its doubled payload leaves that saving out.

Related research Max q (Wikipedia)NASA Glenn, Dynamic Pressure

See also Spin Launch Lab: 23 atmospheres at the exitSpace Gun Lab: 340 atmospheres at the muzzleJournal: Neal Stephenson’s launch ideas

Acoustic loads

At liftoff, a rocket’s own roar is one of the harshest loads it carries. The sound bounces off the pad and shakes the vehicle and its payload, so launch pads flood themselves with water: on the Space Shuttle’s pad, the spray held the payload bay to about 142 decibels, under its 145 dB limit. Sound is a pressure wave carried by the air, and at 20 km each cubic metre holds about 7% as much air as at sea level. “It’s not as noisy up there,” Stephenson said, so a rocket launched there would not have to be built to survive its own noise. The tool does not model sound.

Related research NASA, Sound Suppression System (Space Shuttle, archived)NASA, NASA Ramps Up Space Launch System Sound Suppression Testing (2014)

See also Journal: Why launch rockets from a 20 km tower?Journal: Neal Stephenson’s launch ideas

Orbital speed

Space is close; staying there takes speed. To circle Earth 200 km up, a spacecraft has to move sideways at √(μ/r) ≈ 7.8 km/s, so that it falls around the planet instead of into it. Height is a small share of that job: 20 km is worth g·h ≈ 196 kJ per kilogram, orbital speed ½v² ≈ 30.4 MJ, so the tower supplies about 0.6% of the energy, as much as 626 m/s of speed. The tower helps the engine, not the climb.

Related research Orbital speed (Wikipedia)Low Earth orbit (Wikipedia)

See also Newton’s Cannon: why satellites don’t fall downSpace Gun Lab: the burn that finishes an orbitWays to space: Why is getting to orbit so hard?

Learn more

More ways to space

A tower is one of four launch ideas Neal Stephenson studied at Blue Origin. The guide compares all four, and the other three films are here.

Keep exploring

Up next

  1. Interactive · EngineeringHow does SpinLaunch throw rockets into space?
  2. Interactive · ScienceWhy does a whip crack?
  3. Interactive · EngineeringWhy build a 10 km space gun?

About this tool

Why launch rockets from a 20 km tower?

Raise a rocket’s launch pad from sea level to 20 km and watch the air fall away, the engine bell grow and the payload double, from a NASA Glenn study.

Subject
Engineering
Topics
rockets · launch towers · atmosphere · rocket engines · Neal Stephenson
Published
In the catalog
Why launch rockets from a 20 km tower?

The same idea, by other creators